Peter Fairbrother wrote:
Ben Laurie wrote:


OK, since my previous attempt to create a lower volume
ukcrypto-like-thing failed, I have concluded that the only way to handle
the problem is to produce a moderated version of ukcrypto. I know for
sure there's demand for this, but I also know that the volume is too
high for traditional moderation methods (at least too high for _me_ to
use traditional moderation).


I have a question. What do you think is on topic?


The original charter, as I understand it, was to discuss UK legislation relating to cryptography - which is fine, but very little is happening in that area right now, and there would be virtually no posts.

I would include privacy and anonymity as well as cryptography. I'm open to persuasion for other topics.


Killing time isn't one of them.

--
ApacheCon! 13-17 November! http://www.apachecon.com/

http://www.apache-ssl.org/ben.html       http://www.thebunker.net/

"There is no limit to what a man can do or how far he can go if he
doesn't mind who gets the credit." - Robert Woodruff

---------------------------------------------------------------------
The Cryptography Mailing List
Unsubscribe by sending "unsubscribe cryptography" to [EMAIL PROTECTED]

Reply via email to