On Feb 22, 2005, at 10:57, Dan Kaminsky wrote:
The point is that the thief should think anything expensive is protected, by which I mean it's too traceable to fence.
That would be the thinking of a thief who read the article and took it at face value. A more clever thief would realize that the magic water would respond to *his* ultraviolet light just as well as the police's. (And in today's climate, the counter-counteraction will be a measure to outlaw ultraviolet lights in the hands of private citizens ...)
"Let's vary piracy / with a little burglary!"
--------------------------------------------------------------------- The Cryptography Mailing List Unsubscribe by sending "unsubscribe cryptography" to [EMAIL PROTECTED]
