bear wrote: > > On Sat, 8 Apr 2006, Ben Laurie wrote: > >>> Well the other kind of disincentive was a credit card number. My >>> suggestion was to use a large denomination ecash coin to have >>> anonymous disincentives :) ie you get fined, but you are not >>> identified. >> The problem with that disincentive is that I need to sink the money for >> each certificate I have. Clearly this doesn't scale at all well. >> > > > Um, if it's anonymous and unlinkable, how many certificates do you > need? I should think the answer would be "one."
If they represent cash, then lots. The more the better. -- http://www.links.org/ --------------------------------------------------------------------- The Cryptography Mailing List Unsubscribe by sending "unsubscribe cryptography" to [EMAIL PROTECTED]
