* Jason Holt <[EMAIL PROTECTED]> wrote: > >On Thu, 04 May 2006 18:14:09 +0200, markus reichelt <[EMAIL PROTECTED]> > >wrote: > >>Agreed; but regarding unix systems, I know of none crypto > >>implementation that does integrity checking. Not just de/encrypt the > >>data, but verify that the encrypted data has not been tampered with. > > There's also ecryptfs: > > http://ecryptfs.sourceforge.net/
Thanks to you both; and good to see that ecryptfs is actively maintained. I might check it out myself but I'll definitely link it. I'm interested as well in watermark/dictionary attacks (like on mainline cryptoloop) on ecryptfs. Something like mentioned here, http://mail.nl.linux.org/linux-crypto/2005-11/msg00016.html Users of ecrypt are also encouraged to share their views on stability/reliability of ecryptfs. -- left blank, right bald
pgpkTz67V0vwE.pgp
Description: PGP signature
