* Jason Holt <[EMAIL PROTECTED]> wrote:

> >On Thu, 04 May 2006 18:14:09 +0200, markus reichelt <[EMAIL PROTECTED]>
> >wrote:
> >>Agreed; but regarding unix systems, I know of none crypto
> >>implementation that does integrity checking. Not just de/encrypt the
> >>data, but verify that the encrypted data has not been tampered with.
> There's also ecryptfs:
> http://ecryptfs.sourceforge.net/

Thanks to you both; and good to see that ecryptfs is actively
maintained. I might check it out myself but I'll definitely link it.

I'm interested as well in watermark/dictionary attacks (like on
mainline cryptoloop) on ecryptfs. Something like mentioned here,

Users of ecrypt are also encouraged to share their views on
stability/reliability of ecryptfs.

left blank, right bald

Attachment: pgpkTz67V0vwE.pgp
Description: PGP signature

Reply via email to