On Sun, 4 Jun 2006 16:52:38 -0500, "Marcos el Ruptor" <[EMAIL PROTECTED]> wrote:
> > > http://defectoscopy.com/forum/viewtopic.php?t=3 > > http://defectoscopy.com/results.html > and > http://defectoscopy.com/background.html > Are there any peer-reviewed descriptions of your technique? Right now, all that site seems to have -- and forgive me if I've missed a link -- is a set of simple assertions about various ciphers, plus a fairly vague background page. Put another way, and I hate to be this blunt, is there any reason to think your results are correct and/or meaningful? --Steven M. Bellovin, http://www.cs.columbia.edu/~smb --------------------------------------------------------------------- The Cryptography Mailing List Unsubscribe by sending "unsubscribe cryptography" to [EMAIL PROTECTED]
