Victor Duchovni wrote: > On Sun, Jan 28, 2007 at 12:47:18PM -0500, Thor Lancelot Simon wrote: > > > That doesn't make sense to me -- the end-of-chain (server or client) > > certificate won't be signed by _both_ the old and new root, > I wouldn't > > think (does x.509 even make this possible)? > > > > Or do I misunderstand? > > The key extra information is that old and new roots share the same issuer > and subject DNs and public key, only the start/expiration dates differ, > so in the overlap when both are valid, they are interchangeable, both > verify the same (singly-signed) certs.
To expand on what Duchovni said, you might want to look into the concept of cross-certificates (which are heavily used with bridges). The surprising thing, at first, is that you can issue any certificate after it was originally issued. I can issue the leaf cert you got from Verisign last year. Tomorrow, I could create my own SS Root CA, and issue a cert for the Verisign Intermediate CA, by putting myself as the Issuer, the Verisign Intermediate CA as the Subject, and putting the Verisign ICA public key in it. Your leaf cert will now chain happily up to either the Verisign SS Root, or my new SS Root. So this is not just a thing that works for renewing self-signed roots. > What I don't understand is how > the old (finally expired) root helps to validate the new unexpired root, > when a verifier has the old root and the server presents the new root > in its trust chain. I shouldn't speak for Gutmann, but I assumed that he meant that the server should send the new root *before* the old root expires, so that the client can prepare in advance for the expiry. As an aside, there are some funny issues around having a signature done before the signer cert expired, but deciding *after* the cert has expired, whether to trust it. It was ok yesterday, but maybe it's not ok today -- what has changed...? Geoffrey --------------------------------------------------------------------- The Cryptography Mailing List Unsubscribe by sending "unsubscribe cryptography" to [EMAIL PROTECTED]