On 01 May 2007 22:33, Jon Callas wrote: > On May 1, 2007, at 12:53 PM, Perry E. Metzger wrote:
> unsigned char* guess_key(void) > { > unsigned > char key[] = {0x0a, 0xFa, 0x12, 0x03, > 0xD9, 0x42, 0x57, 0xC6, > 0x9E, 0x75, 0xE4, 0x5C, > 0x64, 0x57, 0x89, 0xC1}; > > return key; > } > > (Or it would if I'd put the actual AACS key in there.) Heh, that's a bit like the old issue of whether you can publish an OTP that has certain "interesting" properties when used to en/decrypt some other public domain information. See also http://preview.tinyurl.com/3dcse6 http://preview.tinyurl.com/2d3hm3 http://preview.tinyurl.com/2ey2mj for more variations on this theme. Wonder if you can issue a take-down notice for a 301 redirect? cheers, DaveK -- Can't think of a witty .sigline today.... --------------------------------------------------------------------- The Cryptography Mailing List Unsubscribe by sending "unsubscribe cryptography" to [EMAIL PROTECTED]