Nicolas Williams wrote:
> Providing a suitable e-mail security solution for the
> masses strikes me as more important than providing
> anonymity to the few people who want or need it.  Not
> that you can't have both, unless you want everyone to
> use PGP or S/MIME as a way to hide anonymized traffic
> from non-anonymized traffic.

If email goes away - as I hope and expect it will - we
will need a new store and forward solution to support
anonymity.

A store and forward system is a system without end to
end real time round trips.  Obviously end to end real
time round trips prevent anonymity.

A system built on top of a best effort unreliable
messaging system requires some round tripping, which
does not make anonymity impossible, but does make it
tricky.  Email's architecture is very nice for
supporting anonymity.

---------------------------------------------------------------------
The Cryptography Mailing List
Unsubscribe by sending "unsubscribe cryptography" to majord...@metzdowd.com

Reply via email to