"Perry E. Metzger" <pe...@piermont.com> writes:

>[Explanation of why courts aren't Turing machines]

Very nice explanation.  The name I've used for this (attempted) defence is the
Rumpelstiltskin defence, for reasons that should be obvious (and at some point
I'll get around to finishing the writeup on this, which I get motivated to do
every time I see someone advocate the Rumpelstiltskin defence as a strategy to
use in court).

Peter.

---------------------------------------------------------------------
The Cryptography Mailing List
Unsubscribe by sending "unsubscribe cryptography" to majord...@metzdowd.com

Reply via email to