-----BEGIN PGP SIGNED MESSAGE----- Hash: SHA1 On 08/26/2013 09:26 AM, Perry E. Metzger wrote:
> Mix networks are, however, a well technique. Onion networks, which > are related, are widely deployed right now in the form of Tor, and > work well. I see little reason to believe mix networks would not > also work well for instant messages and email (see my other > thread, begun yesterday.) What is considered acceptible latency these days for IM or e-mail? Supposedly, the highest acceptible latency for web browsing before the user gets bored and closes the tab is two or three seconds (supposedly...), so where would the lag for e-mail or IM fall anymore before users give up on it? That is a serious question, by the bye. People's standands of what is and is not acceptible effort and speed seems very skewed to geek standards these days. If those figures for web browsing are accurate, and if two clicks to start the TBB really are too much for people today... realistically speaking, what would be required to make secure communication apps worth it for many people? - -- The Doctor [412/724/301/703] [ZS] Developer, Project Byzantium: http://project-byzantium.org/ PGP: 0x807B17C1 / 7960 1CDC 85C9 0B63 8D9F DD89 3BD8 FF2B 807B 17C1 WWW: https://drwho.virtadpt.net/ Who are you? -----BEGIN PGP SIGNATURE----- Version: GnuPG v2.0.20 (GNU/Linux) Comment: Using GnuPG with Thunderbird - http://www.enigmail.net/ iEYEARECAAYFAlIbywQACgkQO9j/K4B7F8H9iACdHz7uQ1/QmEWl92QFIuj9oaZI 2+IAoIsxJ/kbd31eYK246vbM7PdspCk7 =5iiO -----END PGP SIGNATURE----- _______________________________________________ The cryptography mailing list cryptography@metzdowd.com http://www.metzdowd.com/mailman/listinfo/cryptography
