On 6 September 2013 18:24, Perry E. Metzger <pe...@piermont.com> wrote:
> On Fri, 6 Sep 2013 18:18:05 +0100 Ben Laurie <b...@links.org> wrote: > > On 6 September 2013 18:13, Perry E. Metzger <pe...@piermont.com> > > wrote: > > > > > Google is also now (I believe) using PFS on their connections, and > > > they handle more traffic than anyone. A connection I just made to > > > https://www.google.com/ came out as, TLS 1.2, RC4_128, SHA1, > > > ECDHE_RSA. > > > > > > It would be good to see them abandon RC4 of course, and soon. > > > > > > > In favour of what, exactly? We're out of good ciphersuites. > > I thought AES was okay for TLS 1.2? Isn't the issue simply that > Firefox etc. still use TLS 1.0? Note that this was a TLS 1.2 > connection. > Apart from its fragility, AES-GCM is still OK, yes. The problem is that there's nothing good left for TLS < 1.2.
_______________________________________________ The cryptography mailing list firstname.lastname@example.org http://www.metzdowd.com/mailman/listinfo/cryptography