On 2013-10-01 08:51, Watson Ladd wrote:
On Mon, Sep 30, 2013 at 2:21 PM, James A. Donald <[email protected]
<mailto:[email protected]>> wrote:
Weaker in ways that the NSA has examined, and the people that
chose the winning design have not.
This isn't true: Keccak's designers proposed a wide range of capacity
parameters for different environments.
This is not Keccak's design.
This a new unexamined design somewhat resembling Keccak's design.
Or perhaps Keccak's design somewhat resembled what the NSA had already
decided to do.
_______________________________________________
The cryptography mailing list
[email protected]
http://www.metzdowd.com/mailman/listinfo/cryptography
