Adam Back wrote: > I dont believe it was intended to be rude, just a tongue in cheek way > of saying that the attack is impractical or inapplicable to openSSL. > > You have to have a bit of history perhaps to appreciate Peter's > comments - he's actually the author of many very funny and insightful > comments and articles on the state of applied cryptography :)
Totally agree, not to mention tomorrow (in the USA) is April Fool's day. Take a look at the history of some of the "RFC"s submitted on April 1st and you will see what I mean. It's a tradition. BTW, sorry if I offended you or anyone else. That was certainly not my intent. -kevin -- Kevin W. Wall "The most likely way for the world to be destroyed, most experts agree, is by accident. That's where we come in; we're computer professionals. We cause accidents." -- Nathaniel Borenstein, co-creator of MIME _______________________________________________ cryptography mailing list [email protected] http://lists.randombit.net/mailman/listinfo/cryptography
