On Sep 26, 2010, at 6:14 PM, Steven Bellovin wrote:

> Does anyone know of any ciphers where bits of keys modify the control path, 
> rather than just data operations?  Yes, I know that that's a slippery 
> concept, since ultimately things like addition and multiplication can be 
> implemented with loops in the hardware or firmware.  I also suspect that it's 
> potentially dangerous, since it might create very hard-to-spot classes of 
> weak keys.  The closest I can think of is SIGABA, where some of the keying 
> controlled the stepping of the other rotors.

If you remember (or even read) Dan Brown's mid-late-'90s novel, "Digital 
Fortress," in which the MacGuffin was an unbreakable cipher, I was amused when 
I read it that Brown blurred the difference between code and data. The keys in 
Brown's cipher were both data and self-modifying instructions in some virtual 
machine. It didn't make sense in the way that software actually works, but this 
made the cipher some weird cross between crypto and a polymorphic virus. It was 
plain in the description that he'd gotten a little knowledge about each and 
combined them to create a dangerous thing.

There have also been LFSR-type things that used some bits to control stepping 
of other things, a la SIGABA, but I think that Digital Fortress is the closest 
thing to what you want.

        Jon

_______________________________________________
cryptography mailing list
[email protected]
http://lists.randombit.net/mailman/listinfo/cryptography

Reply via email to