On Nov 8, 2010, at 7:51 AM, Jonathan Katz wrote:

> I am looking for a short signature scheme (certainly shorter than RSA 
> signatures, as short as possible would be nice...) that is *patent-free* and 
> (less important) easy to implement. Any suggestions?

To generalize what Adam said, DSA (and that includes ECDSA) is 2x the hash 
size. If you're willing to settle for a 160-bit hash, then it's 40 bytes. If 
you need to use a 256-bit hash, it's the obvious 64.

Most other signatures schemes have signatures that are proportional to the size 
of the key, which could work to your advantage depending on a lot of variables.

        Jon


_______________________________________________
cryptography mailing list
[email protected]
http://lists.randombit.net/mailman/listinfo/cryptography

Reply via email to