On 17/11/10 2:16 AM, Jack Lloyd wrote: > This is due to excessive paranoia on the part of RH's legal department > (they are assuming even ECDH over GF(p) is still patented, for > instance). I pointed them to draft-mcgrew-fundamental-ecc [1], > hopefully once that hits RFC they will take it into > consideration.
FRAND patent license terms being incompatible with the GPL in the face of Certicom's IPR disclosure: https://datatracker.ietf.org/ipr/1337/ I wouldn't bet on it. _______________________________________________ cryptography mailing list [email protected] http://lists.randombit.net/mailman/listinfo/cryptography
