[email protected] writes:
>Does the fact that parts of Stuxnet was signed by two valid certs
>count as a cryptographic failure?
The crypto worked perfectly, it was everything around it that failed.
(Which has been the case for every other security failure involving modern
crypto as well [0]).
Peter.
[0] Just for the nitpickers, that means properly-designed crypto using non-toy
keys.
_______________________________________________
cryptography mailing list
[email protected]
http://lists.randombit.net/mailman/listinfo/cryptography
