Hello list,

Recently, Wired published material on their website which are claimed to be 
logs of instant message conversations between Bradley Manning and Adrian Lamo 
in that infamous case. [1] I have only casually skimmed them, but did notice 
the following two lines:

    (12:24:15 PM) bradass87 has not been authenticated yet. You should 
authenticate this buddy.
    (12:24:15 PM) Unverified conversation with bradass87 started.

I'm sure most of you will be familiar; this is evidence that a technology known 
as Off-the-Record Messaging (OTR) [2] was used in the course of these alleged 
conversations.

I apologize if this is off topic or seems trivial, but I think a public 
discussion of the merits (or lack thereof) of these alleged "logs" from a 
technical perspective would be interesting. The exact implications of the 
technology may not be very well known beyond this list. I have carbon copied 
this message to the defense in the case accordingly.

If I understand correctly, OTR provides deniability, which means that these 
alleged "logs" cannot be proven authentic. In fact, the OTR software is 
distributed with program code which makes falsifying such "logs" trivial. Is 
this correct?

On a related note, a strange message to Hacker News at about that time [3] 
seems to now have found a context. Not to mention talk of "compromised" PGP 
keys: the prosecution witness created a new key pair June 2, 2010 (after 6 
months with no keys for that email address -- why precisely then?), and 
replaced these a day less than one month later -- citing "previous key 
physically compromised." [4] Note the arrest in the case occurred in between 
these two events, with encrypted emails purportedly having been received in the 
meantime: [5]

    "Lamo told me that Manning first emailed him on May 20 ..."

What do you think? First the prosecution witness turns out less than credible, 
[6] now the key piece of evidence is mathematically provably useless...

[1] http://www.wired.com/threatlevel/2011/07/manning-lamo-logs/
[2] http://www.cypherpunks.ca/otr/
[3] http://news.ycombinator.com/item?id=1410158
[4] 
http://pgp.mit.edu:11371/pks/lookup?search=adrian+lamo&op=vindex&fingerprint=on
[5] http://www.salon.com/news/opinion/glenn_greenwald/2010/06/18/wikileaks
[6] http://www.google.com/search?q=lamo+drugs
_______________________________________________
cryptography mailing list
[email protected]
http://lists.randombit.net/mailman/listinfo/cryptography

Reply via email to