On Wed, Jul 13, 2011 at 8:40 PM, Peter Gutmann <[email protected]> wrote:
> Maybe we travel in different circles, but both in sysadmin circles and in > instances where it's come up in the past on security lists as an example of a > successful security protocol, it reason for success has always been presented > as a telnet replacement (and other usage followed from that). Right, I agree it was a telnet replacement, but my argument is that the value proposition wasn't just or event mostly security. It plain old just worked better, the security benefits were just a nice addition. - Andy _______________________________________________ cryptography mailing list [email protected] http://lists.randombit.net/mailman/listinfo/cryptography
