Marsh Ray <[email protected]> writes: >Do we need then a whole spectrum of "Super Validation", "Hyper Validation", >and "Ludicrous Validation" to address the ridiculous deficiencies found in >these current pwned EV CAs?
It has been suggested that we need a kind of meta-CA or CA for CAs (CACA). Then the browser vendors could code CACA into the browsers, and we'd all be trusting in CACA. Or maybe we already are. Peter. _______________________________________________ cryptography mailing list [email protected] http://lists.randombit.net/mailman/listinfo/cryptography
