On Thu, Sep 15, 2011 at 6:40 AM, Kevin W. Wall <[email protected]> wrote: > So now we see we need (at least) something like: > > trust<level, context> > > to model trust. Where before we just were (implicitly) > using something like > > trust<{T,F}, context> > > (which allowed us to model only complete trust or no trust), we > find we now need something more like: > > trust<[0,1], context> > > That is, we model level as a real number in the range 0 to 1, > inclusive.
This sounds just like KeyMan, which I made ages ago. http://keyman.aldigital.co.uk/. _______________________________________________ cryptography mailing list [email protected] http://lists.randombit.net/mailman/listinfo/cryptography
