No, they had ecc and I saw no references to hash chains or trees. But that would be a right/interesting direction. On Nov 27, 2011 12:42 AM, "Adam Back" <[email protected]> wrote:
> I only skimmed the high level but I presume they would be using a merkle > hash-tree and time-stamp server or something like that so it cant revise > its > story later and its current state can be audited by anyone against its > advertised information. > > Adam > > On Sat, Nov 26, 2011 at 11:36:11PM +1100, ianG wrote: > >> >> https://eff.org/sovereign-keys >>> >>> On that page you can find links to a high level overview and detailed >>> design >>> docs. The design has a number of nice features, including very strong >>> resistance to server impersonation attacks and automatic failover to >>> secure >>> routing methods (ideally, Tor hidden services) when server impersonation >>> occurrs. >>> >> >> As far as I can see, this is a third party repository for the keys. >> Which claims to reliabily deliver the keys on request? >> >> Is that it? >> >> iang >> ______________________________**_________________ >> cryptography mailing list >> [email protected] >> http://lists.randombit.net/**mailman/listinfo/cryptography<http://lists.randombit.net/mailman/listinfo/cryptography> >> > ______________________________**_________________ > cryptography mailing list > [email protected] > http://lists.randombit.net/**mailman/listinfo/cryptography<http://lists.randombit.net/mailman/listinfo/cryptography> >
_______________________________________________ cryptography mailing list [email protected] http://lists.randombit.net/mailman/listinfo/cryptography
