On Fri, Dec 2, 2011 at 2:00 PM, ianG <i...@iang.org> wrote: > On 3/12/11 03:36 AM, Ben Laurie wrote: >> >> On Fri, Dec 2, 2011 at 4:14 PM, ianG<i...@iang.org> wrote: >>> >>> On 2/12/11 23:00 PM, Peter Gutmann wrote: >>>> >>>> I guess if you're running into this sort of thing for the first time >>>> then >>>> you'd be out for blood, but if you've been aware of this it going on for >>>> more >>>> than a decade then it's just business as usual for commercial PKI. I'm >>>> completely unfazed by it, it's pretty much what you'd expect. >>> >>> >>> Wifebeating syndrome :) I was aware of the claim of MITMing, but nobody >>> offered proof and it sort of faded away under the cover of NDAs. >> >> Note that this is still the case :-) > > > Which is the point of security by NDA :) > > Whoever said security by obscurity doesn't work? Must have been on > something. :) _______________________________________________ cryptography mailing list cryptography@randombit.net http://lists.randombit.net/mailman/listinfo/cryptography
- Re: [cryptography] if MitM via sub-CA is going on, need a ... Adam Back
- Re: [cryptography] if MitM via sub-CA is going on, need a ... Peter Gutmann
- Re: [cryptography] if MitM via sub-CA is going on, need a ... Adam Back
- Re: [cryptography] if MitM via sub-CA is going on, need a ... Peter Gutmann
- Re: [cryptography] if MitM via sub-CA is going on, need a ... Rose, Greg
- Re: [cryptography] if MitM via sub-CA is going on, need a ... James A. Donald
- Re: [cryptography] if MitM via sub-CA is going on, need a ... ianG
- Re: [cryptography] if MitM via sub-CA is going on, need a ... ianG
- Re: [cryptography] if MitM via sub-CA is going on, need a ... Ben Laurie
- Re: [cryptography] if MitM via sub-CA is going on, need a ... ianG
- Re: [cryptography] if MitM via sub-CA is going on, need a ... Jeffrey Walton
- Re: [cryptography] if MitM via sub-CA is going on, need a ... jd.cypherpunks
- Re: [cryptography] if MitM via sub-CA is going on, need a ... dan
- Re: [cryptography] if MitM via sub-CA is going on, need a ... Peter Gutmann
- Re: [cryptography] if MitM via sub-CA is going on, need a ... ianG
- Re: [cryptography] if MitM via sub-CA is going on, need a ... Peter Gutmann
- Re: [cryptography] if MitM via sub-CA is going on, need a ... Lucky Green
- Re: [cryptography] really sub-CAs for MitM deep packet ins... Ben Laurie
- Re: [cryptography] really sub-CAs for MitM deep packet ins... Kevin W. Wall
- Re: [cryptography] really sub-CAs for MitM deep packet ins... Lucky Green
- Re: [cryptography] really sub-CAs for MitM deep packet ins... Ondrej Mikle