On Sat, Dec 3, 2011 at 1:10 AM, J.A. Terranson <[email protected]> wrote:
> It's been a very long time since I've heard Rubberhose kicked around these > parts, but wasn't it specifically designed to provide deniability through > the production of a "false key" which provided an alternative decryption > that appeared to be "all the data" via the false key (while leaving the > actual secret data unencrypted)? Bingo. DM-Steg operates under the same principle, however the workings are different. - Leo _______________________________________________ cryptography mailing list [email protected] http://lists.randombit.net/mailman/listinfo/cryptography
