On Sat, Dec 31, 2011 at 10:29 PM, Kevin W. Wall <[email protected]> wrote: > On Sat, Dec 31, 2011 at 9:56 PM, Jeffrey Walton <[email protected]> wrote: >> On Sat, Dec 31, 2011 at 9:05 PM, Kevin W. Wall <[email protected]> >> wrote: >>> On Tue, Dec 27, 2011 at 6:12 PM, Steven Bellovin <[email protected]> >>> wrote: >>> [snip] >>>>[snip] > >>> It would give people an opportunity to teach >>> how to create secure passwords and to critique weak ones by >>> showing why they are weak. >> I think this would be a bad idea. I imagine it would promote stemming >> related attacks. If not completely anonymous and coupled with some >> reconnaissance (IP => Company, find some users at company.com), it >> could prove to be a very dangerous practice. > > Well, I wasn't referring to making the results "public", but rather treating > them as proprietary, within the confines of a company. Should have made > that clear. Gotcha. Treat it as IP - perhaps a creative work - and protect it through Copyright and DRM in case of loss ;)
Jeff _______________________________________________ cryptography mailing list [email protected] http://lists.randombit.net/mailman/listinfo/cryptography
