On 2012-04-09 10:17 AM, Steven Bellovin wrote:
I'd put most of it down to conflicting agendas -- even people
you regard as "evil" don't see themselves that way; they
simply have a different definition -- agenda -- for "good".

An agenda which requires them to lie about what they believe, stack committees, falsify the evidence, and personally destroy, Alinsky style, those who mention inconvenient truths.

One can disagree on the likelihood or
impact of a vulnerability, but generally not its existence,
until the audience is politicians.

The probability that the audience is politicians tends to increase with the size of the meeting.
_______________________________________________
cryptography mailing list
[email protected]
http://lists.randombit.net/mailman/listinfo/cryptography

Reply via email to