On Fri, Jul 27, 2012 at 12:07 PM, Givonne Cirkin <[email protected]> wrote:
> I have programmed another prototype codec for Frequency. normalization. It
> is available from my website, www.givonzirkind.weebly.com On the download
> page.
I have not read the paper yet, may have more comment when I do.
Your abstract has
"Hence, the assertion that these combination of methods are
computationally secure--impervious to brute force."
That assertion is bogus. Being "impervious to brute force" is a
rather weak claim; any cipher that has adequate key size and
a non-braindead design achieves that.
However, "computationally secure" is a far larger claim; to
validate that you would need to show that your system
resists not only brute force but a large range of other
attacks. At a minimum, it should resist both linear and
differential cryptanalysis, since those are powerful
general attack methods.
_______________________________________________
cryptography mailing list
[email protected]
http://lists.randombit.net/mailman/listinfo/cryptography
