On Tue, Oct 30, 2012 at 12:10 PM, Paul Hoffman <[email protected]> wrote: > On Oct 30, 2012, at 9:11 AM, Thierry Moreau <[email protected]> > wrote: > >> Then it's just a matter of the shortest route to finish: route a) secure the >> swap, route b) monitor software components for maximum memory usage vs >> physical mem plus make a memory exhaustion fault analysis. > > Errr, isn't the shortest route c) don't use swap in that system? You are not > *forced* to use swap in Linux: I have plenty of Linux instances where it is > not turned on. > > Noting that it is humorous that people are attributing this to bad OpenSSL, > not bad understanding of the places where OpenSSL runs.... > I'm not sure anyone is blaming negative platform interactions on OpenSSL (I did not get that impression). It is what it is.
A comment in the source code on occasion warning about the negative interaction would be nice though. +1 if its properly formatted, too. Jeff _______________________________________________ cryptography mailing list [email protected] http://lists.randombit.net/mailman/listinfo/cryptography
