However, quantum cryptography adds so many more requirements that it has almost no benefits at all compared to what we have already. Den 8 jan 2013 00:19 skrev <[email protected]>:
> > There is already too much hype over QKD. It's "unbreakable" (if you pay > > no attention to all those vulnerabilities at the physical layer that can > > be exploited by attackers anywhere in between the encrypter and the > > decrypter). > > > > David > > > > But software crypto algorithms suffer from the same problems, say RSA it's > unbreakable if you pay no attention to all software vulnerabilities in > the implementation like memory corruptions, weak key generation, etc. > > I see QC as security schemes relying in physical hard problems instead > of a purely mathematical hard problems. As such they are often more > expensive than software-only protocols but interesting nonetheless. > > > _______________________________________________ > cryptography mailing list > [email protected] > http://lists.randombit.net/mailman/listinfo/cryptography >
_______________________________________________ cryptography mailing list [email protected] http://lists.randombit.net/mailman/listinfo/cryptography
