On Fri, Jun 14, 2013 at 11:20 PM, <[email protected]> wrote: > DWave comes to mind. >
Sure yeah, under the list of "things that can't possibly be useful in any way for the problem described". The DWave machine is widely considered to not be a universal quantum computer[1], and *even if it was*, which it isn't, there are no known quantum algorithms which offer any serious benefit in this arena. [1] See for instance: http://www.scottaaronson.com/blog/?p=1400 -- > -- -- -- -- > Venimus, Vidimus, Dolavimus > > [email protected] > [email protected] > [email protected] > [email protected] > [email protected] > [email protected] > h: 512-657-1279 > w: 512-845-8989 > http://hackerspaces.org/wiki/Confusion_Research_Center > http://confusionresearchcenter.org > http://arbornet.org (ravage) > > Adapt, Adopt, Improvise > -- -- -- -- > _______________________________________________ > cryptography mailing list > [email protected] > http://lists.randombit.net/mailman/listinfo/cryptography > -- Noon Silk Fancy a quantum lunch? https://sites.google.com/site/quantumlunch/ "Every morning when I wake up, I experience an exquisite joy — the joy of being this signature."
_______________________________________________ cryptography mailing list [email protected] http://lists.randombit.net/mailman/listinfo/cryptography
