On Mon, Sep 9, 2013 at 6:08 AM, Jon Callas <j...@callas.org> wrote: >> ... I have to disagree with you. Lots of us have told >> Intel that we really need to see the raw bits, and lots of >> us have gotten informal feedback that we'll see that in a >> future chip.
On 2013-09-10 3:43 AM, coderman wrote: > i've never seen this stated; it would be great news! Good cop, bad cop. Unofficial reassurance is never worth anything, it is always a prelude to betrayal, always a lie told with malice and intent to harm, I am not reporting on how Intel works, I am reporting on how large bureaucratic organizations work. _______________________________________________ cryptography mailing list cryptography@randombit.net http://lists.randombit.net/mailman/listinfo/cryptography
