On Mon, Jun 9, 2014 at 8:54 AM, John Young <[email protected]> wrote:
> ...
> BTW, are you at liberty to reveal the secrets of bio-chemical
> TEMPEST? The inadvertent body odor is somewhat more
> reliable than facial and corporeal. Rumor of testing on the
> bio-chem harvesting in prisons, separation of sexes into
> their many varieties of posturing, impostering, hybridity
> and crossings.


there's an industry around such sensing; the microprocessor coming to
field assays on a chip.

where is the privacy advocate's concern on such chemsense developments?

(a few conference papers and journal proceedings, is all the rest classified?)
_______________________________________________
cryptography mailing list
[email protected]
http://lists.randombit.net/mailman/listinfo/cryptography

Reply via email to