You're quite right. If anyone is interested in some of the more information theoretical approaches to steganography, I have several chapters about it in *Disappearing Cryptography. *Pretty rudimentary, of course, but it might be a help.
http://www.amazon.com/gp/product/0123744792/ref=as_li_tl?ie=UTF8&camp=1789&creative=390957&creativeASIN=0123744792&linkCode=as2&tag=myhomepage0bc&linkId=LCZPZBSBFE2HXQ77 On Fri, Jul 18, 2014 at 7:45 PM, Sampo Syreeni <[email protected]> wrote: > > So what *is* it with you people? Can't you see that steganography really > starts and ends with information and coding theory, unlike cryptography? > Its bounds really necessarily and from the start have to do with noise and > uncertainty, whereas crypto protocols only deal with clean data and > computational complexity (eventually, preferably, proven-to-be-hard > one-way-functions). Steganography really is its own, separate field, > eventhough it shares most of the randomness, signal processing, complexity > and whatnot, framework, with current crypto proper. >
_______________________________________________ cryptography mailing list [email protected] http://lists.randombit.net/mailman/listinfo/cryptography
