cryptography  

Messages by Date

• 2001/07/26 New results on WEP (fwd) Matt Blaze
• 2001/07/25 <nettime> uncle george gives crypto a leg up R. A. Hettinga
• 2001/07/25 Activists want to repeal DMCA, but Washington, DC still loves it Declan McCullagh
• 2001/07/25 FBI SirCammed R. A. Hettinga
• 2001/07/24 stegdetect-0.2x Niels Provos
• 2001/07/24 2600 Australia Cybercrime Bill 2001 Inquiry Submission Grant Bayley
• 2001/07/24 New Herbivore bad eating for Carnivore(s) R. A. Hettinga
• 2001/07/24 Adobe bows to pressure, recommends release of Russian programmer Declan McCullagh
• 2001/07/24 FC: Adobe bows to pressure, recommends release of Russian hacker R. A. Hettinga
• 2001/07/23 Fwd: Hush Communications corporation Michael Sims
• 2001/07/21 RE: HushMail 2.0 released, supports OpenPGP standard Noah Salzman
• 2001/07/21 new *fast* version of BitTorrent out Bram Cohen
• 2001/07/20 Re: HushMail 2.0 released, supports OpenPGP standard Declan McCullagh
• 2001/07/20 Re: HushMail 2.0 released, supports OpenPGP standard Ben Laurie
• 2001/07/19 HushMail 2.0 released, supports OpenPGP standard Declan McCullagh
• 2001/07/19 Hacker Arrest Stirs Protest R. A. Hettinga
• 2001/07/19 Re: I'm looking for FSE2001 proceedings Pete Chown
• 2001/07/18 Re: I'm looking for FSE2001 proceedings Paul Crowley
• 2001/07/18 Re: I'm looking for FSE2001 proceedings Dean Povey
• 2001/07/18 Re: Criminal conduct and "cryptography." (Adobe vs. Sklyarov) Eric Rescorla
• 2001/07/18 www.boycottadobe.com Perry E. Metzger
• 2001/07/18 Re: I'm looking for FSE2001 proceedings Helger Lipmaa
• 2001/07/18 Re: I'm looking for FSE2001 proceedings dmolnar
• 2001/07/18 Re: I'm looking for FSE2001 proceedings Pete Chown
• 2001/07/18 Welcome to Vegas, You're Under Arrest (fwd) Eugene Leitl
• 2001/07/18 I'm looking for FSE2001 proceedings Alex Alten
• 2001/07/18 SFS for anonymity Peter Fairbrother
• 2001/07/17 Re: Adobe Jail (fwd) Bill Frantz
• 2001/07/17 USA v. Dmitry Sklyarov John Young
• 2001/07/17 Adobe Jail (fwd) Eugene Leitl
• 2001/07/17 Programmer arrested Perry E. Metzger
• 2001/07/17 Programmer arrested for Defcon talk? Perry E. Metzger
• 2001/07/17 e-journals in applied crypto / secure e-commerce Amir Herzberg
• 2001/07/16 Re: Crypto hardware Arnold G. Reinhold
• 2001/07/15 A Protective Path Paved in Granola R. A. Hettinga
• 2001/07/13 Re: Crypto hardware Jurgen Botz
• 2001/07/13 Re: pseudonymous decentralized marketplace lcs Mixmaster Remailer
• 2001/07/12 pseudonymous decentralized marketplace Ray Dillinger
• 2001/07/12 DCSB: David Birch; European Wireless E-Commerce R. A. Hettinga
• 2001/07/12 RE: Crypto hardware John Lowry
• 2001/07/12 Re: Crypto hardware Greg Troxel
• 2001/07/12 Re: Crypto hardware Derek Atkins
• 2001/07/12 Re: FW: Zero-Knowledge proofs for valid decryption !! Emmanouil Magkos
• 2001/07/12 Re: Crypto hardware David Honig
• 2001/07/12 Navajo Code Talkers William Allen Simpson
• 2001/07/12 Re: Crypto hardware em
• 2001/07/12 Re: Crypto hardware Eric Murray
• 2001/07/12 RE: Crypto hardware John P. Sullivan
• 2001/07/12 Re: Crypto hardware R. A. Hettinga
• 2001/07/10 Crypto hardware Kent Crispin
• 2001/07/10 anonymous comment on Zero-Knowledge proofs for valid decryption !! Andy Neff
• 2001/07/10 Re: Zero-Knowledge proofs for valid decryption !! lcs Mixmaster Remailer
• 2001/07/10 Re: FW: Zero-Knowledge proofs for valid decryption !! lcs Mixmaster Remailer
• 2001/07/09 Re: Your password must be at least 18,770 char... David Honig
• 2001/07/09 FW: Zero-Knowledge proofs for valid decryption !! Andy Neff
• 2001/07/09 Re: Your password must be at least 18,770 char... Matt Crawford
• 2001/07/09 Re: Zero-Knowledge proofs for valid decryption !! lcs Mixmaster Remailer
• 2001/07/09 Your password must be at least 18,770 char... Rick Smith at Secure Computing
• 2001/07/09 [ANNOUNCE] OpenSSL 0.9.6b Richard Levitte
• 2001/07/09 [ANNOUNCE] OpenSSL 0.9.6b Richard Levitte
• 2001/07/09 [ANNOUNCE] OpenSSL 0.9.6b Richard Levitte
• 2001/07/09 No Subject Richard Levitte
• 2001/07/09 Re: non-repudiation, was Re: crypto flaw in secure mail standards Lynn . Wheeler
• 2001/07/09 Re: non-repudiation, was Re: crypto flaw in secure mail standards Lynn . Wheeler
• 2001/07/09 Re: Zero-Knowledge proofs for valid decryption !! Helger Lipmaa
• 2001/07/09 Zero-Knowledge proofs for valid decryption !! Emmanouil Magkos
• 2001/07/08 Re: non-repudiation, was Re: crypto flaw in secure mail standards Lynn . Wheeler
• 2001/07/08 Re: Australian government says CoE Cybercrime Convention DOES conferGAK powers Grant Bayley
• 2001/07/07 Fwd: Re: Crypographically Strong Software Distribution HOWTO Greg Broiles
• 2001/07/07 Re: non-repudiation, was Re: crypto flaw in secure mail standards Eric Rescorla
• 2001/07/07 Re: non-repudiation, was Re: crypto flaw in secure mail standards Lynn . Wheeler
• 2001/07/07 Re: non-repudiation, was Re: crypto flaw in secure mail standards Lynn . Wheeler
• 2001/07/07 Re: non-repudiation, was Re: crypto flaw in secure mail standards Rodney Thayer
• 2001/07/07 Australian government says CoE Cybercrime Convention DOES confer GAK powers Caspar Bowden
• 2001/07/03 Re: Crypographically Strong Software Distribution HOWTO Ask Bjoern Hansen
• 2001/07/03 IP: Celebrating the Fourth R. A. Hettinga
• 2001/07/03 Re: Crypographically Strong Software Distribution HOWTO Rich Salz
• 2001/07/03 Re: Sender and receiver non-repudiation Lynn . Wheeler
• 2001/07/03 Re: Crypographically Strong Software Distribution HOWTO V. Alex Brennen
• 2001/07/03 Re: Crypographically Strong Software Distribution HOWTO Greg Broiles
• 2001/07/03 Re: Crypographically Strong Software Distribution HOWTO V. Alex Brennen
• 2001/07/03 Re: Sender and receiver non-repudiation David Honig
• 2001/07/03 Re: Crypographically Strong Software Distribution HOWTO Ben Laurie
• 2001/07/03 Re: Crypographically Strong Software Distribution HOWTO Ben Laurie
• 2001/07/03 Re: Crypographically Strong Software Distribution HOWTO V. Alex Brennen
• 2001/07/03 Re: Sender and receiver non-repudiation Eugene Leitl
• 2001/07/03 Re: Crypographically Strong Software Distribution HOWTO Rich Salz
• 2001/07/03 Re: Sender and receiver non-repudiation Lynn . Wheeler
• 2001/07/03 Re: Sender and receiver non-repudiation Helger Lipmaa
• 2001/07/03 Re: Sender and receiver non-repudiation Dimitrios . Petropoulos
• 2001/07/03 Re: Sender and receiver non-repudiation Emmanouil Magkos
• 2001/07/03 Re: Crypographically Strong Software Distribution HOWTO Rich Salz
• 2001/07/03 Re: Crypographically Strong Software Distribution HOWTO Ben Laurie
• 2001/07/03 Sender and receiver non-repudiation Panayiotis Kotzanikolaou
• 2001/07/02 Re: Crypographically Strong Software Distribution HOWTO V. Alex Brennen
• 2001/07/02 Re: Crypographically Strong Software Distribution HOWTO Donald E. Eastlake 3rd
• 2001/07/02 Re: Crypographically Strong Software Distribution HOWTO Don Davis
• 2001/07/02 Re: Crypographically Strong Software Distribution HOWTO Bill Frantz
• 2001/07/02 Re: Crypographically Strong Software Distribution HOWTO Sandy Harris
• 2001/07/02 Re: Crypographically Strong Software Distribution HOWTO Bram Cohen
• 2001/07/02 Re: Crypographically Strong Software Distribution HOWTO Jon Callas
• 2001/07/02 Re: Crypographically Strong Software Distribution HOWTO Kent Crispin
• 2001/07/02 Re: Crypographically Strong Software Distribution HOWTO Rich Salz
• 2001/07/02 Re: [JXTA Security] Anonymity Snake Oil in JXTA Ben Laurie
• 2001/07/02 non-repudiation, was Re: crypto flaw in secure mail standards Greg Broiles
• 2001/07/02 Crypographically Strong Software Distribution HOWTO V. Alex Brennen
• 2001/07/02 [Press Release List] IBM and Zero-Knowledge Systems: A sharedVision For Privacy R. A. Hettinga
• 2001/07/02 Re: blocking chinese domains? Ray Dillinger
• 2001/07/02 Re: Crypto Quotations Sam Simpson
• 2001/07/02 Re: blocking chinese domains? Helger Lipmaa
• 2001/07/02 Crypto Quotations Udhay Shankar N
• 2001/07/02 Re: blocking chinese domains? John R. Levine
• 2001/06/29 DCSB Call for Speakers R. A. Hettinga
• 2001/06/29 Re: archives? Steven M. Bellovin
• 2001/06/29 blocking chinese domains? Don Davis
• 2001/06/28 Re: archives? Sandy Harris
• 2001/06/28 Re: Zero Knowledge Identity Proofs Dimitrios . Petropoulos
• 2001/06/28 Re: archives? Antonomasia
• 2001/06/27 archives? max curious
• 2001/06/27 Re: Zero Knowledge Identity Proofs Marc Branchaud
• 2001/06/27 ANNOUNCE: PGP Corporate Desktop 7.1 Now Available R. A. Hettinga
• 2001/06/27 RE: DMCA / When you decrypt, that's illegal Paul Kierstead
• 2001/06/26 Re: Zero Knowledge Identity Proofs Dimitrios . Petropoulos
• 2001/06/26 Re: Zero Knowledge Identity Proofs Dimitrios . Petropoulos
• 2001/06/26 DMCA / When you decrypt, that's illegal R. A. Hettinga
• 2001/06/26 Re: crypto flaw in secure mail standards dmolnar
• 2001/06/26 Turing honored with statue. Trei, Peter
• 2001/06/26 Re: crypto flaw in secure mail standards John Kelsey
• 2001/06/25 Re: crypto flaw in secure mail standards Bill Frantz
• 2001/06/25 Re: Zero Knowledge Identity Proofs Marc Branchaud
• 2001/06/25 Re: crypto flaw in secure mail standards Charlie_Kaufman
• 2001/06/25 Re: crypto flaw in secure mail standards James M Galvin
• 2001/06/25 Re: crypto flaw in secure mail standards Ben Laurie
• 2001/06/25 Re: crypto flaw in secure mail standards Ian BROWN
• 2001/06/25 Re: crypto flaw in secure mail standards Ian BROWN
• 2001/06/25 Re: crypto flaw in secure mail standards Ian BROWN
• 2001/06/25 Re: crypto flaw in secure mail standards Ian BROWN
• 2001/06/25 Re: Zero Knowledge Identity Proofs Dimitrios . Petropoulos
• 2001/06/25 Re: Zero Knowledge Identity Proofs Helger Lipmaa
• 2001/06/24 Re: crypto flaw in secure mail standards Enzo Michelangeli
• 2001/06/24 Re: crypto flaw in secure mail standards Peter Fairbrother
• 2001/06/24 Re: crypto flaw in secure mail standards lcs Mixmaster Remailer
• 2001/06/24 Re: crypto flaw in secure mail standards P.J. Ponder
• 2001/06/24 Re: crypto flaw in secure mail standards Greg Broiles
• 2001/06/24 Zero Knowledge Identity Proofs Michael Conlen
• 2001/06/24 Re: crypto flaw in secure mail standards Riad S. Wahby
• 2001/06/24 Re: crypto flaw in secure mail standards Enzo Michelangeli
• 2001/06/24 Re: crypto flaw in secure mail standards Eric Rescorla
• 2001/06/24 Re: crypto flaw in secure mail standards Don Davis
• 2001/06/24 Re: crypto flaw in secure mail standards Peter Gutmann
• 2001/06/23 NSA Snooping Domestic Crypto Materials John Young
• 2001/06/23 Re: crypto flaw in secure mail standards Jeffrey I. Schiller
• 2001/06/23 Re: crypto flaw in secure mail standards Jon Callas
• 2001/06/23 Re: crypto flaw in secure mail standards dmolnar
• 2001/06/23 Re: crypto flaw in secure mail standards Derek Atkins
• 2001/06/23 Re: crypto flaw in secure mail standards Bram Cohen
• 2001/06/23 Re: crypto flaw in secure mail standards James M Galvin
• 2001/06/23 Re: crypto flaw in secure mail standards lcs Mixmaster Remailer
• 2001/06/23 crypto flaw in secure mail standards Don Davis
• 2001/06/23 Re: crypto flaw in secure mail standards Ben Laurie
• 2001/06/23 Re: crypto flaw in secure mail standards Radia Perlman - Boston Center for Networking
• 2001/06/23 Re: crypto flaw in secure mail standards Bram Cohen
• 2001/06/22 Re: crypto flaw in secure mail standards Jeffrey I. Schiller
• 2001/06/22 Re: crypto flaw in secure mail standards lcs Mixmaster Remailer
• 2001/06/22 Re: crypto flaw in secure mail standards Derek Atkins
• 2001/06/22 crypto flaw in secure mail standards Don Davis
• 2001/06/21 Re: septillion operations per second David Honig
• 2001/06/21 Re: septillion operations per second Matt Crawford
• 2001/06/21 Re: Cryptobox (was Re: Edupage, June 20, 2001) Greg Broiles
• 2001/06/21 Re: Cryptobox (was Re: Edupage, June 20, 2001) Eric Murray
• 2001/06/21 Re: septillion operations per second Ian Goldberg
• 2001/06/21 Re: septillion operations per second Ian Goldberg
• 2001/06/21 Cryptobox (was Re: Edupage, June 20, 2001) R. A. Hettinga
• 2001/06/21 Re: septillion operations per second Ben Laurie
• 2001/06/21 Re: septillion operations per second David Honig
• 2001/06/21 Re: septillion operations per second Arnold G. Reinhold
• 2001/06/21 Re: septillion operations per second Mike Brodhead
• 2001/06/21 Re: septillion operations per second Helger Lipmaa
• 2001/06/20 septillion operations per second Barry Wels
• 2001/06/20 [Fwd: Illegal Prime] R. Hirschfeld
• 2001/06/18 from IP: Feds will data tap under CALEA Perry E. Metzger
• 2001/06/17 Re: WAS: Thermal Imaging Decision Applicable to TEMPEST? Bill Stewart
• 2001/06/16 Re: ...or linux, for that matter... ji
• 2001/06/16 ...or linux, for that matter... R. A. Hettinga
• 2001/06/16 George Fabyan Steve Bellovin
• 2001/06/15 RC5-64 attack reaches 50% mark. Trei, Peter
• 2001/06/14 Re: Starium (was Re: article: german secure phone) Eric Blossom
• 2001/06/14 DCSB: Phill Hallam-Baker; Trust Services and Second Generation PKI R. A. Hettinga
• 2001/06/14 Re: Thermal Imaging Decision Applicable to TEMPEST? David Koontz
• 2001/06/14 Re: Starium (was Re: article: german secure phone) Paul Crowley
• 2001/06/14 [Users] DoCoMo USA cellular real-time IPSEC job posting R. A. Hettinga
• 2001/06/14 [EFCE2K] Scheduled programme - 9 days and counting R. A. Hettinga
• 2001/06/13 The summer of OAEP lcs Mixmaster Remailer
• 2001/06/13 Re: WAS: Thermal Imaging Decision Applicable to TEMPEST? John Young
• 2001/06/13 WAS: Thermal Imaging Decision Applicable to TEMPEST? David G. Koontz
• 2001/06/13 Re: tapping undersea fibers? Bill Stewart
• 2001/06/13 Re: secure phone (was Re: Starium...) David Honig
• 2001/06/13 Re: Thermal Imaging Decision Applicable to TEMPEST? Andrew Brown
• 2001/06/13 Re: Thermal Imaging Decision Applicable to TEMPEST? Arnold G. Reinhold
• 2001/06/12 Re: Thermal Imaging Decision Applicable to TEMPEST? Sidney Markowitz

[Earlier messages] [Later messages]