At 02:23 AM 6/2/01 +0100, Peter Fairbrother wrote: >seabed. Cable sinks, deliberately, and thus has weight. depends of course on >the elasticity of the whole cable, but as the fibres are made of glass... > >e) fiber optic cables can't take that much stress (or even that much strain) >and function properly > The glass is an insignificant part of the cable. See Stephenson's story in an old Wired for more on cable construction and placement. --------------------------------------------------------------------- The Cryptography Mailing List Unsubscribe by sending "unsubscribe cryptography" to [EMAIL PROTECTED]
- RE: NSA tapping undersea fibers? Harry Hawk
- Re: NSA tapping undersea fibers? John Denker
- Re: NSA tapping undersea fibers? Matt Crawford
- Re: NSA tapping undersea fibers? David Honig
- Re: NSA tapping undersea fibers? Eivind Eklund
- RE: NSA tapping undersea fibers? Bo Elkj�r
- Re: NSA tapping undersea fibers? John Denker
- Re: NSA tapping undersea fibers? Peter Fairbrother
- Re: NSA tapping undersea fibers? Matt Crawford
- Re: NSA tapping undersea fibers? Peter Fairbrother
- Re: NSA tapping undersea fibers? David Honig
- Re: NSA tapping undersea fibers? John Denker
- NSA tapping undersea fibers? Lenny Foner
- Re: NSA tapping undersea fibers? David Honig
- Re: NSA tapping undersea fibers? Matt Crawford
- Re: NSA tapping undersea fibers? Peter Fairbrother
- Re: NSA tapping undersea fibers? Steven M. Bellovin
- RE: NSA tapping undersea fibers? Trei, Peter
