--
Perry E. Metzger <[EMAIL PROTECTED]> wrote:
> >Because it is typically slower by many times than hand
> >tuned assembler.
On 14 Sep 2001, at 14:24, Ian Goldberg wrote:
> Are you sure? For general code, that certainly hasn't been
> true in a long time; optimizing compilers nowadays can
> often do *better* then hand-coded assembler.
So say compiler writers.
I have not found this to be true. Perhaps it is true of some
compilers and some people's assembler, and some code.
--digsig
James A. Donald
6YeGpsZR+nOTh/cGwvITnSR3TdzclVpR0+pr3YYQdkG
R+xhXGtvscaNbOpfLSnwjeziDpDOv2XtF4/h1ST9
4Haf1Gw4kSOsLRysU1Atpc78QFbNBjP0Dr0J4Ji3I
---------------------------------------------------------------------
The Cryptography Mailing List
Unsubscribe by sending "unsubscribe cryptography" to [EMAIL PROTECTED]
