At 02:47 PM 1/14/2002 -0800, Eric Rescorla wrote: >> Meanwhile, the information that the user >> really looks at to make a security decision (the Palm logo and the >> little padlock) aren't related at all. >No possible security system can protect people who trust >whatever logo happens to be transmitted to them in web pages.
That is certainly true today, but that is precisely how users decide whether or not to give up their credit card numbers or more sensitive information. It's a good thing that the user is absolved of liability in case the credit card is stolen. I disagree that it's not possible to secure logos. It's a MMOP (mere matter of programming). :) - Carl +--------------------------------------------------------+ |Carl Ellison Intel E: [EMAIL PROTECTED] | |2111 NE 25th Ave M/S JF3-212 T: +1-503-264-2900 | |Hillsboro OR 97124 F: +1-503-264-6225 | |PGP Key ID: 0xFE5AF240 C: +1-503-819-6618 | | 1FDB 2770 08D7 8540 E157 AAB4 CC6A 0466 FE5A F240 | +--------------------------------------------------------+ --------------------------------------------------------------------- The Cryptography Mailing List Unsubscribe by sending "unsubscribe cryptography" to [EMAIL PROTECTED]
