"P.J. Ponder" wrote: > Without think about it some more, I don't know whether to place the entire > notion of security controls based on biometric telemetry in with _pure_ > bullshit like copy protection, watermarking, non-repudiation, tamper > proofing, or trusted third parties. Admittedly, there is a lot of > bullshit in the idea, I'm just not sure it is pure.
Why are trusted third parties pure bullshit? Surely there are circumstances where a third party really can be trusted? Or are you talking about the tainted meaning of TTPs (i.e. spooks that hold your private keys)? Cheers, Ben. -- http://www.apache-ssl.org/ben.html http://www.thebunker.net/ "There is no limit to what a man can do or how far he can go if he doesn't mind who gets the credit." - Robert Woodruff --------------------------------------------------------------------- The Cryptography Mailing List Unsubscribe by sending "unsubscribe cryptography" to [EMAIL PROTECTED]