--- begin forwarded text

Status: RO
Date: Tue, 03 Dec 2002 16:31:31 -0800
To: "R. A. Hettinga" <[EMAIL PROTECTED]>,
 "e-gold Discussion" <[EMAIL PROTECTED]>
From: Steve Schear <[EMAIL PROTECTED]>
Subject: Re: [e-gold-list] DBCs now issued by DMT
Cc: [EMAIL PROTECTED]

At 06:45 PM 12/3/2002 -0500, R. A. Hettinga wrote:
>I suppose that if it's not blinded, or at least functionally anonymous,
>like you'd get with statistically-tested streaming cash, it's not *that*
>bearer, but, hey, that's just *my* opinion, right?

Since it has no payee or associated holder information and can "circulate"
via re-issuance (even if there is a charge) it has bearer "characteristics".


>I would assume that anything that has accounts with client names on them is
>probably not bearer, either, though Mark Twain did something quite like
>that.

DMT accounts have no customer information associated.

steve

--- end forwarded text


-- 
-----------------
R. A. Hettinga <mailto: [EMAIL PROTECTED]>
The Internet Bearer Underwriting Corporation <http://www.ibuc.com/>
44 Farquhar Street, Boston, MA 02131 USA
"... however it may deserve respect for its usefulness and antiquity,
[predicting the end of the world] has not been found agreeable to
experience." -- Edward Gibbon, 'Decline and Fall of the Roman Empire'

---------------------------------------------------------------------
The Cryptography Mailing List
Unsubscribe by sending "unsubscribe cryptography" to [EMAIL PROTECTED]

Reply via email to