In message <[EMAIL PROTECTED]>, "Paul A.S. Ward" writes:
>Is it really fair to blame WEP for not using AES when AES wasn't around 
>when WEP was being created?
>

Of course they couldn't have used AES.  But there are other block 
ciphers they could have used.  They could have used key management.  
They could have added a MAC.  They could have used a longer "IV" field, 
with a random starting point mandated by the spec.  Or they could have 
put a big warning on saying "this doesn't protect you from very much".


                --Steve Bellovin, http://www.research.att.com/~smb (me)
                http://www.wilyhacker.com (2nd edition of "Firewalls" book)



---------------------------------------------------------------------
The Cryptography Mailing List
Unsubscribe by sending "unsubscribe cryptography" to [EMAIL PROTECTED]

Reply via email to