I also agree that Pat is making a reasonable point. The problem is that this code is part of a fairly complicated program and the pieces are scattered in many locations. Distilling this program down into a meaningful test case would be difficult, and if I did so I would solve the problem in the process anyway. I was hoping that somebody would see something obvious in my example; if that's not going to happen I'd rather not get you involved in it. At any rate, I think you've answered my question; apparently there's nothing egregious about my use of Crypto++. Thank you both for being so considerate and so willing to help.
--Guy ----- Original Message ----- From: "Michael Barnett" <[EMAIL PROTECTED]> To: <[EMAIL PROTECTED]> Sent: Thursday, July 10, 2003 4:58 PM Subject: RE: CBC_Mode<AES> giving me grief > The devil is in the details. I think Pat is making a reasonable point...without a minimum-compilable segment of code it is impossible to say what MIGHT be causing a problem. Looking at a snippet I might ASSUME you are setting parameters that you have missed, simply because "of course" you have to set the key val. what one programmer assumes "everyone knows" may be the one peice of information another programmer most needs. > -Mike >
