Yes, I suppose that *would* be easier. It was late last night when I wrote that. :]
I just saw the 25Mb debug static library and thought, "my god! My program's going to be HUGE!" > An alternative that is far less painful is to compile Crypto++ as a static > lib, then write a DLL wrapper that exposes only the functions you > need. Then the linker, when building the DLL, will only include the code used. > > michael
