> Why do you need a non-Processor Pack version of Crypto++, BTW? As far as I
> know there are no downsides to the Processor Pack.
One of the developers here has run into problems with the processor pack before. There were workarounds required (the documentation for the processor pack also lists some compile errors you can run into with it).
The information contained in this e-mail message is intended only for the personal and confidential use of the recipient(s) named above. If the reader of this message is not the intended recipient or an agent responsible for delivering it to the intended recipient, you are hereby notified that you have received this document in error and that any review, dissemination, distribution, forwarding, or otherwise copying of this message is strictly prohibited. If you have received this communication in error, please notify Padcom immediately by e-mail at [EMAIL PROTECTED] and delete the original message. Although Padcom utilizes industry accepted methods to scan email and attachments for viruses, it does not guarantee that either is virus-free and accepts no liability for any damage sustained as a result of viruses. Padcom makes no representation or warranty (express or implied) as to the accuracy or completeness of any information provided in this e-mail message and expressly disclaims any and all liability that may be based on information contained therein.
