On Fri, Jan 09, 2004 at 11:11:45PM -0800, Michael Hunley wrote: > Is there a reason the GNUMakefile does not build both versions (or have an > option too) into separate libs?
I'm just not sure how to do that. Please provide a patch if you know a good way to do it. > Also, this was mentioned in a previous > post from someone else, why does the release command line not work? If you > leave the two options (-ffunction-sections -fdata-sections) in the CXXFLAGS > the test suite fails to compile. If you take them out and do "Cryptest z > cryptest.exe cryptest.zip" you get an error (forget what now that I am not > on linux), but specifying the compression level works? Is the compression > level not really optional as the command help suggests? Yeah, it's not optional. Optional parameters are indicated by square brackets. I don't know why I put angle brackets around some of the parameters. I'll take the angle brackets out. > I have been toying with the compiler settings in GNUMakefile, but so far > all attempts to build my app with a release build end with a linker error > having a lengthy function name ending in '::assert<number>'. I have a new > build running while I am away that may work, but the last two attempts were > unsuccessful. Please post an exerpt of the build log with these errors.
