--
On 31 Mar 2005 at 10:26, Jim Starkey wrote:
> I have concluded, with regret, that I have to abandon
> Crypto++ in favor of more suitable libraries.
I also have had a rough time with Crypto++, having to do
a bit of reverse engineering. But what libraries do you
envisage as more suitable? OpenSSL seems to be purely
reverse engineering, instead of merely a bit more
reverse engineering than there should be. Rough though
Crypto++ was, openssl seemed rougher to me.
The heavy use of templates in Crypto++ seems fine to me.
--digsig
James A. Donald
6YeGpsZR+nOTh/cGwvITnSR3TdzclVpR0+pr3YYQdkG
wnThmJKJG4LI7SjLoJ7cKYDro8P58qp6gFs3a+V/
4Dqrz/Aw8qm11IZ93IvAlOflrE9hr+XEAM5HfdejJ
