Hi Joseph,
From how it's presented on the web site, it looks like it should be
against 5.2.1.
Kevin
Joseph Galbraith wrote:
I don't recall: is the patch against 5.2.1 or is it against
cvs?
Thanks,
Joseph
Bob McCown wrote:
Thanks, Kevin. I was avoiding that, but I guess thats what I need to do.
Curious, the line numbers are off by 3 or 4. Also, my dll.h doesnt
have the
CRYPTOPP_DLL_TEMPLATE_CLASS line in it. This is a brand new 5.2.1 source
archive, with no other patches applied.
Curiouser and curiouser.
-----Original Message-----
From: Kevin Hock [mailto:[EMAIL PROTECTED]
Sent: Thursday, September 08, 2005 1:43 PM
To: [email protected]
Subject: Re: gcc 4.0 on Mac OS X 10.4
Hi Bob,
I also got the same result: every hunk was rejected. Rather than fight
it, I just manually applied the patches--it only took a couple of
minutes. This was one of those rare cases where I could do it by hand
faster than having the malfunctioning tools do it. ;)
Kevin
Bob McCown wrote:
Thanks for the reply, Wei.
I had thought so, but when I ran it against the 5.2.1 source tree, I
received the following errors:
finagle:~/Desktop/cryptopp521 % patch < crypto521gcc4patch
patching file iterhash.h
Hunk #1 FAILED at 88.
1 out of 1 hunk FAILED -- saving rejects to file iterhash.h.rej
patching file lubyrack.h
Hunk #1 FAILED at 38.
1 out of 1 hunk FAILED -- saving rejects to file lubyrack.h.rej
patching file seckey.h
Hunk #1 FAILED at 21.
Hunk #2 FAILED at 31.
Hunk #3 FAILED at 50.
3 out of 3 hunks FAILED -- saving rejects to file seckey.h.rej
patching file dll.cpp
Hunk #1 FAILED at 1.
Hunk #2 FAILED at 37.
2 out of 2 hunks FAILED -- saving rejects to file dll.cpp.rej
finagle:~/Desktop/cryptopp521 %
