I assume the next release will support vs2005, because the .sln in cvs is already updated.
Is there any official word on when that release will happen or the stability of the cvs head? It would be a good idea to keep a vs2003 .sln there just so users could pick between any version of visual studio. On 8/8/06, Søren Dreijer <[EMAIL PROTECTED]> wrote:
Yeah, it compiles but some parts of the library fail during run-time: http://www.mail-archive.com/[email protected]/msg02728.html (make sure you read the entire thread) I have yet to hear back from the library's developers on the matter... - Soren ________________________________ > From: [EMAIL PROTECTED] > To: [email protected] > Subject: RE: VS 2005 + Crypto > Date: Tue, 8 Aug 2006 09:29:46 -0700 > > So far I have not had any problems with using 5.2.3 with VS2005. > > I have a c++ program using cyptopp in static link library format exchanging > AES data with a .NET 2.0/1.1 c# set of programs. > > I have not tested any of the other functionality yet, but it all compiled > without a hitch, (aside from deprecated/security warnings). > > > > -----Original Message----- > From: [EMAIL PROTECTED] [mailto:[EMAIL PROTECTED] > Sent: Tuesday, August 08, 2006 8:11 AM > To: [email protected] > Subject: VS 2005 + Crypto > > Im wondering if VS 2005 will be officially support by crypto++ any time > soon. > > Since it currently is not, I have 4 options from what i can tell to > try to get it to work with vs 2005. > > 1. CVS head > 2. The zip file from http://www.ibiblio.org/weidai/cryptopp_20060419.zip > 3. 5.2.3 on sourceforge and not listed on the home page. > 4. 5.2.1 mentioned on the the homepage. > > > I am confused as to which i should be using to get the most successful > results. I am somewhat weary of using cvs head or some zip file since > i wonder of the stability. > > Thanks > Anthony > > > ________________________________ Be one of the first to try Windows Live Mail.
