Hi AJ,
...news groups sci.crypt and rec.puzzles right?
Yes. BTW, sci.crypt has a fellow (TSD) who can be unmanagle at times... He's the NFL's equivalent of Terrell Owens to sci.crypt.
> I've been round and round with various folks...
I imagine the fellows who are qualified are inundated by requests. Perhaps you could generate more interest at a Crypto conference? Zimmerman had an early PGP symmetric cipher evalualted that way. I think it was by Rivest or Shamir. Jeff On 11/17/06, Mayorga, Armando CTR NIOC Norfolk N361 <[EMAIL PROTECTED]> wrote:
Thanks Jeff, I've been round and round with various folks trying to get this algo looked at for an objective analysis, its frustrating, now I believe you are referring me to the news groups sci.crypt and rec.puzzles right? AJ -----Original Message----- From: Jeffrey Walton [mailto:[EMAIL PROTECTED] Sent: Friday, November 17, 2006 11:49 To: [email protected] Subject: Re: Algorithm eval Hi Armando, Have you tried sci.crypt and (don't be insulted) rec.puzzles? The sci.crypt FAQ will point you to rec.puzzles - so I wanted to mention. Jeff On 11/17/06, Mayorga, Armando CTR NIOC Norfolk N361 <[EMAIL PROTECTED]> wrote: > Hello all, > > I am looking to see if anyone can provide an "objective" mathematical > analysis of an encryption algorithm that I have developed. I am not > interested in subjective "opinions" but rather a group or someone who > can look at the math for inherent weaknesses >
