It turns out there's an attack for this signature scheme. You can find the discussion at http://groups.google.com/group/sci.crypt/tree/browse_frm/thread/351ede73af57d6bb/.
----- Original Message ----- From: "Jeffrey Walton" <[EMAIL PROTECTED]> To: "Crypto++" <[EMAIL PROTECTED]> Sent: Sunday, December 31, 2006 10:00 PM Subject: Quartz Alternative (McEliece Signature Scheme) > > Hi All, > > Does anyone have any input on the McEliece Signature Scheme. It is > supposed to produce smaller signatures than Quartz, using a larger > Key. The system looks interesting because it is a bit aged, so I'm > hoping it is less emcumbered with patents. > > Jeff > > > --~--~---------~--~----~------------~-------~--~----~ You received this message because you are subscribed to the Google Groups "Crypto++ Users" group. To post to this group, send email to [EMAIL PROTECTED] To unsubscribe from this group, send email to [EMAIL PROTECTED] For more options, visit this group at http://groups.google.com/group/cryptopp-users?hl=en -~----------~----~----~----~------~----~------~--~---
