More a flaw in the google groups search software perhaps (or the way I
use it at least). If you don't want an array source in the library
perhaps something specific in the FAQ-o-matic would suffice; thank you
everyone for the advice (and on my other threads too).

By the way Mr Dai, the whole buffered transformations concept... wow!

On Apr 17, 4:40 am, "Wei Dai" <[EMAIL PROTECTED]> wrote:
> Please seehttp://groups.google.com/group/cryptopp-users/msg/68b6039686dd8917.
>
> The fact that this question gets asked so often perhaps indicates a design
> flaw. I'll add an explicit ArraySource class in the next version.
>
>
>
> ----- Original Message -----
> From: "Patrick" <[EMAIL PROTECTED]>
> To: "Crypto++ Users" <[EMAIL PROTECTED]>
> Sent: Monday, April 16, 2007 4:45 AM
> Subject: Array Source
>
> > Hello,
> > Has any one written or attempted to write an array source class for
> > use with crypto++?
> > Has it proven to be very difficult and abandoned?
> > Is there another way of sourcing binary data from memory into a filter
> > chain (i.e. not using a fileSource)?
> > If I wrote one would it be worth posting anywhere?
> > Thanks,
> > Patrick- Hide quoted text -
>
> - Show quoted text -


--~--~---------~--~----~------------~-------~--~----~
You received this message because you are subscribed to the "Crypto++ Users" 
Google Group.
To unsubscribe, send an email to [EMAIL PROTECTED]
More information about Crypto++ and this group is available at 
http://www.cryptopp.com.
-~----------~----~----~----~------~----~------~--~---

Reply via email to